How to pay for Australia’s floods? Cut money from climate abatement, decides PM

It is certainly difficult to attribute a specific natural disaster to climate change. But if you’ve chosen to side with the 95% of climate scientists who believe that the Earth’s climate is changing and that we are mainly responsible, then you probably know that one predicted consequence is an increase in the intensity of natural disasters. (At least that’s what the people who have spent their careers studying the Earth’s climate say – you know, the people whose opinions actually count in this sort of debate.)

The devastating floods in Queensland and Victoria should be a wake up call. Ocean surface temperatures around much of our coasts are 2-3° C warmer than this time last year, and that means more evaporation and more rain. But rather than taking this into account and saying, “Maybe we better prepare for more devastation by combating climate change,” PM Julia Gillard is doing the polar opposite.

An article in today’s West Australian outlines the government’s plans to pay for the massive clean-up bill – something like $5.6 billion

$1.8b is to come from a controversial tax levy that amounts to about $5 a week for someone making $100,000 a year. Sounds pretty reasonable, I think. Checkout where some of the other money is coming from:

  • Abolish Green Car Innovation Fund ($234m)
  • Reduce Carbon Capture and Storage Flagships ($250m)
  • Reduce Solar Flagships ($250m)
  • Cap solar hot water rebate scheme ($160m)
  • Not proceed with the second stage of Green Start ($129m)
  • Cap LPG vehicle conversion scheme ($96m)
  • Reduce Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute ($55m)

The list goes on.

It’s an unbelievably short-sighted plan. It’s like paying to care for AIDS sufferers by cutting back on condom supplies. It’s like covering a black-eye with makeup and saying everything will be OK.

There are such logical alternatives. Where are the extra levies on the industries responsible for emitting so much carbon dioxide in the first place? The mining and manufacturing industries? The people that can afford to pay.

Please, Julia, stop trying to please the big businesses and start looking a little further into Australia’s future.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Climate Change, Science and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to How to pay for Australia’s floods? Cut money from climate abatement, decides PM

  1. leadinglight says:

    If the Greens support this levy, their party would lose its political standing. So I think this might not be quite as easy to enforce.

  2. Arsen Darnay says:

    Nice new blog. Australia should be happy! Thanks for your comment on “Scams” on mine. Can’t say that I’m “happy” that others have the same problem, but it is reassuring to know that I’m not alone…

  3. IntrusiveAndArrogant says:

    “Where are the extra levies on the industries responsible for emitting so much carbon dioxide in the first place? The mining and manufacturing industries? The people that can afford to pay.”

    Needless to remind anybody of past events, but do you remember what the mining industry threatened last time govt. tried to hit them up for cash? It’s really very catch-22.

    It’s still pleasing to see that people still exist that are willing to do their own research, before forming opinions about these kinds of decisions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s